Fanout vs mLabs
Both are Brazilian and start near R$29.90. mLabs bills per client; Fanout bills by connected accounts — several profiles on the same network sit on one plan.
Read the comparison →Global market
Fanout vs Postiz
Postiz is cloud and also self-host. If you want the scheduler on your server, they win. Fanout is a hosted product, with studio, approval, and MCP in the same place.
| Criterion | Fanout | Postiz |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | US$19/mo | US$29/mo |
| You pay for | Connected accounts | Connected accounts |
| On the first plan | 15 accounts | Varies on cloud / self-host |
| X / Twitter | No | Yes |
| Threads and Bluesky | Yes | Yes |
| Google Business | Pending API | No |
| Official APIs only | Yes | Yes |
| One original, crop per network | Yes | No |
| Media preparation | Yes | No |
| MCP (agents) | Add-on | No |
| REST API | Add-on | Yes |
| Approval by link | Yes | No |
| Support | Human | Community / cloud |
| Trial | 7 days · card required | Self-host or cloud |
when Fanout fits
Where we win.
- You don't operate each network's API keys, upgrades, or backups. Fanout operates that.
- Per-network preparation, approval links, and MCP in the same hosted product.
- If you don't want to become the scheduler's DevOps, you stay on Fanout.
when they fit
Where Postiz still wins.
- Self-host and open source. If the requirement is the binary on your machine, Postiz wins.
- They have X. Fanout doesn't.
- Their cloud also starts near US$29 — the real win is control, not price.
who it's for
The honest cut.
For anyone who wants a hosted scheduler without standing up a server. Postiz is the choice if self-host is the point.
Competitor prices are typical public list prices and they change. Fanout prices are ours, today. LinkedIn, Google Business, and Pinterest on Fanout still depend on API approval.
other comparisons
Fanout versus each one.
Fanout vs Flux
Flux also anchors the first plan at R$29.90 and bills per client. Fanout uses the same price floor, with accounts included and a composer built for nine networks.
Read the comparison →Fanout vs Buffer
Buffer charges per channel. Five networks become five lines on the invoice. Fanout charges by accounts on the plan — Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube for the same brand don't triple the price.
Read the comparison →Fanout vs Hootsuite
Hootsuite is an enterprise panel: seats, workflows, listening. The price starts far from Fanout. If you need that, we are not the replacement. If you need to post to nine networks without the panel, we are.
Read the comparison →Fanout vs post-bridge
The product cut is the closest: scheduling, studio, API, MCP, accounts on the plan. The difference is the market, X, and the trial.
Read the comparison →